If a rule-change as proposed is unclear, ambiguous, paradoxical, or destructive of play, or if it arguably consists of two or more rule-changes compounded or is an amendment that makes no difference, or if it is otherwise of questionable value, then the other players may suggest amendments or argue against the proposal before the vote. A reasonable time must be allowed for this debate. The proponent decides the final form in which the proposal is to be voted on and, unless the Judge has been asked to do so, also decides the time to end debate and vote.

Anyone is welcome to add their views on a rule in the commentary section and a signature. Use a separator at the end.

I'm not sure this is a good rule. It might be my first target for amendment. There should be one single round of proposals, perhaps with a time limit.

— modulux 2024-03-18T15:56